<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Playhouse of privacy, security, hacking, encryption, intelligence and some business stuff &#187; Privacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infosecurity.ch/category/privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infosecurity.ch</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:04:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>RFC 6189: ZRTP is finally a standard!</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20110411/rfc-6189-zrtp-is-finally-a-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20110411/rfc-6189-zrtp-is-finally-a-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zrtp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20110411/rfc-6189-zrtp-is-finally-a-standard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally ZRTP has been assigned an official RFC assignment, RFC6189 ZRTP: Media Path Key Agreement for Unicast Secure RTP. It had as a dependency the SRTP with AES key size of 256bit that now has been defined as RFC6188. It&#8217;s exciting to see the RFC finally released, as it&#8217;s an important milestone to set ZRTP <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20110411/rfc-6189-zrtp-is-finally-a-standard/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20110411/rfc-6189-zrtp-is-finally-a-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progress for GSM cracking in Freiburg university</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20110223/progress-for-gsm-cracking-in-freiburg-university/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20110223/progress-for-gsm-cracking-in-freiburg-university/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20110223/progress-for-gsm-cracking-in-freiburg-university/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The exciting world of mobile protocols (GSM, GSM-R, TETRA, UMTS, etc) hacking is getting official research activities from universities. The investment to make opensource code releases of cracking software is giving the opportunity to students of university to work on it, improve it and do strong research. The University of Freiburg just released the paper <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20110223/progress-for-gsm-cracking-in-freiburg-university/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20110223/progress-for-gsm-cracking-in-freiburg-university/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My TOR exit node experience trying to filter out noisy traffic</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20110124/my-tor-exit-node-experience-trying-to-filter-out-noisy-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20110124/my-tor-exit-node-experience-trying-to-filter-out-noisy-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 21:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20110124/my-tor-exit-node-experience-trying-to-filter-out-noisy-traffic/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Early this year i decided that&#8217;s time to run a TOR exit node so i brought a VPS at hetzner.de (because they are listed as a Good TOR ISP)and setup the exit-node with nickname privacyresearch.infosecurity.ch with a 100Mbit/s connection for first 1TB of monthly data, then 10MBit/s flat. It also run TOR2WEB software on http://tor.infosecurity.ch <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20110124/my-tor-exit-node-experience-trying-to-filter-out-noisy-traffic/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20110124/my-tor-exit-node-experience-trying-to-filter-out-noisy-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TETRA hacking is coming: OsmocomTETRA</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20110123/tetra-hacking-is-coming-osmocomtetra/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20110123/tetra-hacking-is-coming-osmocomtetra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 09:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20110123/tetra-hacking-is-coming-osmocomtetra/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s very exciting to see the release of OsmocomTETRA, the first opensource SDR (Software Defined Radio) implementation of TETRA demodulator, PHY and lower MAC layers. It&#8217;s the TETRA version of GSM airprobe that unlock access to the data and frame of TETRA communication protocol, thus giving great hacking opportunity! Now that also TETRA technology has <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20110123/tetra-hacking-is-coming-osmocomtetra/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20110123/tetra-hacking-is-coming-osmocomtetra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ZORG, new C++ and Java ZRTP implementation public release</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20110112/zorg-new-c-and-java-zrtp-implementation-public-release/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20110112/zorg-new-c-and-java-zrtp-implementation-public-release/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Jan 2011 13:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zrtp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20110112/zorg-new-c-and-java-zrtp-implementation-public-release/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all, today at PrivateWave Italia S.p.A, italian company engaged in developing technologies for privacy protection and information security in voice telecommunications where i am CTO, we release ZORG, a new open source ZRTP protocol implementation available for download from http://www.zrtp.org . ZRTP [1] provides end-to-end key exchange with Elliptic Curve Diffie-Hellmann 384bit and AES-256 <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20110112/zorg-new-c-and-java-zrtp-implementation-public-release/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20110112/zorg-new-c-and-java-zrtp-implementation-public-release/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Encrypted mobile to landline phone calls with Asterisk 1.8</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20101025/encrypted-mobile-to-landline-phone-calls-with-asterisk-1-8/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20101025/encrypted-mobile-to-landline-phone-calls-with-asterisk-1-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20101025/encrypted-mobile-to-landline-phone-calls-with-asterisk-1-8/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We just released a technical howto on how to build up Secured mobile to landline VoIP infrastructure with: Asterisk 1.8 (just released, support SIP/TLS + SDES key exchange for SRTP) PrivateGSM Enterprise (Nokia / iPhone / Blackberry) SNOM 300 Desktop phone In next weeks others howto like this one will come out by using other <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20101025/encrypted-mobile-to-landline-phone-calls-with-asterisk-1-8/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20101025/encrypted-mobile-to-landline-phone-calls-with-asterisk-1-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PrivateGSM: Blackberry/iPhone/Nokia mobile voice encryption with ZRTP or SRTP/SDES</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20101019/privategsm-blackberryiphonenokia-mobile-voice-encryption-with-zrtp-or-srtpsdes/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20101019/privategsm-blackberryiphonenokia-mobile-voice-encryption-with-zrtp-or-srtpsdes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zrtp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20101019/privategsm-blackberryiphonenokia-mobile-voice-encryption-with-zrtp-or-srtpsdes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I absolutely avoid to use my own personal blog to make promotion of any kind of product. That time it&#8217;s not different, but i want to tell you facts about products i work on without fancy marketing, but staying technical. Today, at PrivateWave where i am CTO and co-founder, we released publicly mobile VoIP encryption <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20101019/privategsm-blackberryiphonenokia-mobile-voice-encryption-with-zrtp-or-srtpsdes/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20101019/privategsm-blackberryiphonenokia-mobile-voice-encryption-with-zrtp-or-srtpsdes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A couple of nice VPN provider</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20101017/a-couple-of-nice-vpn-provider/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20101017/a-couple-of-nice-vpn-provider/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20101017/a-couple-of-nice-vpn-provider/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a lot of reason why one would need to access internet trough a VPN. For example if you live in a country blocking certain contents (like anti-local-government website, porn, etc) and/or protocols (like skype, voip) you would probably want to move your internet connectivity outside the nasty blocking country by using encrypted VPN <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20101017/a-couple-of-nice-vpn-provider/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20101017/a-couple-of-nice-vpn-provider/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not every elliptic curve is the same: trough on ECC security</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100926/not-every-elliptic-curve-is-the-same-trough-on-ecc-security/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100926/not-every-elliptic-curve-is-the-same-trough-on-ecc-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zrtp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100926/not-every-elliptic-curve-is-the-same-trough-on-ecc-security/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My own ECC curve security and selection analysis Most modern crypto use Elliptic Curve Cryptographic (ECC) that, with a smaller key size and reduce computation power, give equivalent security strength of traditional crypto system known as DH (Diffie-Hellman) or RSA (Rivest, Shamir and Adleman) . Not everyone knows that ECC encryption is selected for any <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100926/not-every-elliptic-curve-is-the-same-trough-on-ecc-security/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100926/not-every-elliptic-curve-is-the-same-trough-on-ecc-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESSOR, European Secure Software Defined Radio (SDR)</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100925/essor-european-secure-software-defined-radio-sdr/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100925/essor-european-secure-software-defined-radio-sdr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100925/essor-european-secure-software-defined-radio-sdr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a look at European Defense Agency website and found the ESSOR project, a working project funded for 106mln EUR to develop strategic defense communication products based on new Software Defined Radio approach. SDR approach is a revolutionary system that&#8217;s completely changing the way scientist and industry is approach any kind of wireless technology. <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100925/essor-european-secure-software-defined-radio-sdr/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100925/essor-european-secure-software-defined-radio-sdr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remotely intercepting snom VoIP phones</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100910/remotely-intercepting-snom-voip-phones/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100910/remotely-intercepting-snom-voip-phones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100910/remotely-intercepting-snom-voip-phones/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suggest reading remotely tapping VoIp phones&#8221; on VoIP Security Alliance Blog by Shawn Merdinger . A concrete example on how current telephony infrastructure are getting more vulnerable to cyber attacks.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100910/remotely-intercepting-snom-voip-phones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voice communication security workshop</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100826/voice-communication-security-workshop/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100826/voice-communication-security-workshop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100826/voice-communication-security-workshop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, i made a talk about voice communication security technologies at University of Trento following an interesting information exchange with Crypto Lab managed Professor Massimiliano Sala . I suggest interested people to read it, especially the second part, as there is an innovative categorization of the various voice encryption technologies that get used in several <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100826/voice-communication-security-workshop/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100826/voice-communication-security-workshop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>27C3 &#8211; CCC Congress CFP: We come in peace</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100815/27c3-ccc-congress-cfp-we-come-in-peace/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100815/27c3-ccc-congress-cfp-we-come-in-peace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 07:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kudos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100815/27c3-ccc-congress-cfp-we-come-in-peace/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We come in peace We come in peace, said the conquerers of the New World. We come in peace, says the government, when it comes to colonise, regulate, and militarise the new digital world. We come in peace, say the nation-state sized companies that have set out to monetise the net and chain the users <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100815/27c3-ccc-congress-cfp-we-come-in-peace/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100815/27c3-ccc-congress-cfp-we-come-in-peace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GSM cracking in penetration test methodologies (OSSTMM) ?</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100723/gsm-cracking-in-penetration-test-methodologies-osstmm/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100723/gsm-cracking-in-penetration-test-methodologies-osstmm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100723/gsm-cracking-in-penetration-test-methodologies-osstmm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As most of this blog reader already know, in past years there was a lot of activities related to public research for GSM auditing and cracking. However when there was huge media coverage to GSM cracking research results, the tools to make the cracking was really early stage and still very inefficient. Now Frank Stevenson <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100723/gsm-cracking-in-penetration-test-methodologies-osstmm/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100723/gsm-cracking-in-penetration-test-methodologies-osstmm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snake-oil security claims on crypto security product</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100719/snake-oil-security-claims-on-crypto-security-product/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100719/snake-oil-security-claims-on-crypto-security-product/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100719/snake-oil-security-claims-on-crypto-security-product/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Security market grow, more companies goes to the market, but how many of them are taking seriously what they do? You know, doing security technology mean that you are personally responsible for the protection of the user&#8217;s information. You must make them aware of what they need, exactly what your are doing and which kind <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100719/snake-oil-security-claims-on-crypto-security-product/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100719/snake-oil-security-claims-on-crypto-security-product/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web2.0 privacy leak in Mobile apps</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100717/web2-0-privacy-leak-in-mobile-apps/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100717/web2-0-privacy-leak-in-mobile-apps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 08:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100717/web2-0-privacy-leak-in-mobile-apps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know that web2.0 world it&#8217;s plenty of leak of any kind (profiling, profiling, profiling) related to Privacy and users starts being concerned about it. Users continuously download applications without knowing the details of what they do, for example iFart just because are cool, are fun and sometime are useful. On mobile phones users install <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100717/web2-0-privacy-leak-in-mobile-apps/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100717/web2-0-privacy-leak-in-mobile-apps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AES algorithm selected for use in space</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100708/aes-algorithm-selected-for-use-in-space/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100708/aes-algorithm-selected-for-use-in-space/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100708/aes-algorithm-selected-for-use-in-space/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I encountered a nice paper regarding analysis and consideration on which encryption algorithm it&#8217;s best suited for use in the space by space ship and equipments. The paper has been done by the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems that&#8217;s a consortium of all space agency around that cumulatively handled more than 400 mission to <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100708/aes-algorithm-selected-for-use-in-space/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100708/aes-algorithm-selected-for-use-in-space/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackberry Security and Encryption: Devil or Angel?</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100707/blackberry-security-and-encryption-devil-or-angel/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100707/blackberry-security-and-encryption-devil-or-angel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100707/blackberry-security-and-encryption-devil-or-angel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blackberry have good and bad reputation regarding his security capability, depending from which angle you look at it. This post it&#8217;s a summarized set of information to let the reader the get picture, without taking much a position as RIM and Blackberry can be considered, depending on the point of view, an extremely secure platform <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100707/blackberry-security-and-encryption-devil-or-angel/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100707/blackberry-security-and-encryption-devil-or-angel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Botnet for RSA cracking?</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100630/botnet-for-rsa-cracking/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100630/botnet-for-rsa-cracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100630/botnet-for-rsa-cracking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read an interesting article about putting 1.000.000 computers, given the chance for a serious botnet owner to get it, to crack RSA. The result is that in such context attacking an RSA 1024bit key would take only 28 years, compared to theoretical 19 billion of years. Reading of this article, is extremely interesting because <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100630/botnet-for-rsa-cracking/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100630/botnet-for-rsa-cracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Patent rights and opensource: can they co-exist?</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100627/patent-rights-and-opensource-can-they-co-exist/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100627/patent-rights-and-opensource-can-they-co-exist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jun 2010 11:11:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100627/patent-rights-and-opensource-can-they-co-exist/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[How many of you had to deal with patented technologies? How many of the patented technologies you dealed with was also &#8220;secrets&#8221; in their implementation? Well, there&#8217;s a set of technologies whose implementation is open source (copyright) but that are patented (intellectual property right). A very nice paper about the topic opensource &#38; patents that <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100627/patent-rights-and-opensource-can-they-co-exist/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100627/patent-rights-and-opensource-can-they-co-exist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Encryption Regulations</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100616/china-encryption-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100616/china-encryption-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberwarfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100616/china-encryption-regulations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all, i found this very interesting paper on China Encryption Import/Export/Domestic Regulations done by Baker&#38;Mckenzie in the US. It&#8217;s strongly business and regulatory oriented giving a very well done view on how china regulations works and how it may behave in future. Read here Decrypting China Encryption&#8217;s Regulations (form Bakernet website) .]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100616/china-encryption-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The (old) Crypto AG case and some thinking about it</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100607/the-old-crypto-ag-case-and-some-thinking-about-it/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100607/the-old-crypto-ag-case-and-some-thinking-about-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cyberwarfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100607/the-old-crypto-ag-case-and-some-thinking-about-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the &#8217;90, closed source and proprietary cryptography was ruling the world. That&#8217;s before open source and scientifically approved encrypted technologies went out as a best practice to do crypto stuff. I would like to remind when, in 1992, USA along with Israel was, together with switzerland, providing backdoored (proprietary and secret) technologies to Iranian <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100607/the-old-crypto-ag-case-and-some-thinking-about-it/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100607/the-old-crypto-ag-case-and-some-thinking-about-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile Security talk at WHYMCA conference</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100602/mobile-security-talk-at-whymca-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100602/mobile-security-talk-at-whymca-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zrtp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100602/mobile-security-talk-at-whymca-conference/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to share some slides i used to talk about mobile security at whymca mobile conference in Milan. Read here my slides on mobile security . The slides provide a wide an in-depth overview of mobile security related matters, i should be doing some slidecast about it putting also audio. Maybe will do, maybe <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100602/mobile-security-talk-at-whymca-conference/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100602/mobile-security-talk-at-whymca-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone PIN: useless encryption</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100601/iphone-pin-useless-encryption/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100601/iphone-pin-useless-encryption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100601/iphone-pin-useless-encryption/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently switched one of my multiple mobile phones with which i go around to iPhone. I am particularly concerned about data protection in case of theft and so started having a look around about the iPhone provided protection system. There is an interesting set of iPhone Business Security Features that make me think that <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100601/iphone-pin-useless-encryption/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100601/iphone-pin-useless-encryption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exploit code against SecurStar DriveCrypt published</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100525/hackers-doesnt-like-securstar-products-exploit-code-against-drivecrypt-published/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100525/hackers-doesnt-like-securstar-products-exploit-code-against-drivecrypt-published/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 16:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kudos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100525/hackers-doesnt-like-securstar-products-exploit-code-against-drivecrypt-published/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that the hacking community somehow like to target securstar products, maybe because hacking community doesn&#8217;t like the often revealed unethical approach already previously described in this blog by articles and user&#8217;s comments. In 2004 a lot of accusation against Hafner of SecurStar went out because of alleged intellectual property theft regarding opensource codes <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100525/hackers-doesnt-like-securstar-products-exploit-code-against-drivecrypt-published/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100525/hackers-doesnt-like-securstar-products-exploit-code-against-drivecrypt-published/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quantum cryptography broken</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100520/quantum-cryptography-broken/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100520/quantum-cryptography-broken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 19:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zrtp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100520/quantum-cryptography-broken/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quantum cryptography it&#8217;s something very challenging, encryption methods that leverage the law of phisycs to secure communications over fiber lines. To oversimplify the system is based on the fact that if someone cut the fiber, put a tap in the middle, and joint together the other side of the fiber, the amount of &#8220;errors&#8221; that <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100520/quantum-cryptography-broken/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100520/quantum-cryptography-broken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>great point of view</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/great-point-of-view/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/great-point-of-view/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/great-point-of-view/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because security of a cryptographic system it&#8217;s not a matter of &#8220;how many bits do i use&#8221; but using the right approach to do the right thing to mitigate the defined security risk in the most balanced way.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/great-point-of-view/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Encryption is not scrambling: be aware of scrambler!</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/encryption-is-not-scrambling-be-aware-of-scrambler/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/encryption-is-not-scrambling-be-aware-of-scrambler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zrtp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/encryption-is-not-scrambling-be-aware-of-scrambler/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of us know about voice scrambler that can be used across almost any kind of voice based communication technology. Extremely flexible approach: works everything Extreme performance: very low latency but unfortunately&#8230; Extremely weak: Scrambling cannot be considered secure. Only encryption can be considered secure under the Kerckoff&#8217;s principle . So please don&#8217;t even consider <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/encryption-is-not-scrambling-be-aware-of-scrambler/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/encryption-is-not-scrambling-be-aware-of-scrambler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SecurStar GmbH Phonecrypt answers on the Infosecurityguard/Notrax case: absolutely unreasonable!  :-)</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/answer-of-securstar-gmbh-on-the-infosecurityguardnotrax-case-absolutely-unreasonable/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/answer-of-securstar-gmbh-on-the-infosecurityguardnotrax-case-absolutely-unreasonable/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 17:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/answer-of-securstar-gmbh-on-the-infosecurityguardnotrax-case-absolutely-unreasonable/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[UPDATE 20.04.2010: http://infosecurityguard.com has been disabled. Notrax identity became known to several guys in the voice security environments (cannot tell, but you can imagine, i was right!) and so our friends decided to trow away the website because of legal responsibility under UK and USA laws. UPDATE: Nice summary of the whole story (i know, <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/answer-of-securstar-gmbh-on-the-infosecurityguardnotrax-case-absolutely-unreasonable/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/answer-of-securstar-gmbh-on-the-infosecurityguardnotrax-case-absolutely-unreasonable/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidence that infosecurityguard.com/notrax is SecurStar GmbH Phonecrypt &#8211; A fake independent research on voice crypto</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/evidence-that-infosecurityguard-comnotrax-is-securstar-gmbh-a-fake-independent-research-on-voice-crypto/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/evidence-that-infosecurityguard-comnotrax-is-securstar-gmbh-a-fake-independent-research-on-voice-crypto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/evidence-that-infosecurityguard-comnotrax-is-securstar-gmbh-a-fake-independent-research-on-voice-crypto/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below evidence that the security review made by an anonymous hacker on http://infosecurityguard.com is in facts a dishonest marketing plan by the SecurStar GmbH to promote their voice crypto product. I already wrote about that voice crypto analysis that appeared to me very suspicious. Now it&#8217;s confirmed, it&#8217;s a fake independent hacker security research by <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/evidence-that-infosecurityguard-comnotrax-is-securstar-gmbh-a-fake-independent-research-on-voice-crypto/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/evidence-that-infosecurityguard-comnotrax-is-securstar-gmbh-a-fake-independent-research-on-voice-crypto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dishonest security: The SecurStart GmbH Phonecrypt case</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/dishonest-security-the-securstart-gmbh-case/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/dishonest-security-the-securstart-gmbh-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/dishonest-security-the-securstart-gmbh-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to provide considerations on the concept of ethics that a security company should have respect to the users, the media and the security environment. SecurStar GmbH made very bad things making that infosecuriguard.com fake independent research. It&#8217;s unfair approach respect to hacking community. It&#8217;s unfair marketing to end user. They should not <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/dishonest-security-the-securstart-gmbh-case/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/dishonest-security-the-securstart-gmbh-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>About the SecurStar GmbH Phonecrypt voice encryption analysis (criteria, errors and different results)</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100130/about-the-voice-encryption-analysis-phonecrypt-can-be-intercepted-serious-security-evaluation-criteria/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100130/about-the-voice-encryption-analysis-phonecrypt-can-be-intercepted-serious-security-evaluation-criteria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zrtp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100130/about-the-voice-encryption-analysis-phonecrypt-can-be-intercepted-serious-security-evaluation-criteria/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article want to clarify and better explain the finding at infosecurityguard.com regaring voice encryption product evaluation. This article want to tell you a different point of view other than infosecurityguard.com and explaining which are the rational with extensive explaination from security point of view. Today i read news saying: &#8220;PhoneCrypt: Basic Vulnerability Found in <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100130/about-the-voice-encryption-analysis-phonecrypt-can-be-intercepted-serious-security-evaluation-criteria/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100130/about-the-voice-encryption-analysis-phonecrypt-can-be-intercepted-serious-security-evaluation-criteria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Licensed by Israel Ministry of Defense? How things really works!</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100129/licensed-by-israel-ministry-of-defense-how-things-really-works/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100129/licensed-by-israel-ministry-of-defense-how-things-really-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cyberwarfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100129/licensed-by-israel-ministry-of-defense-how-things-really-works/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You should know that Israel is a country where if a company need to develop encryption product they must be authorized by the government. The government don&#8217;t want that companies doing cryptography can do anything bad to them and what they can do of good for the government, so they have to first be authorized. <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100129/licensed-by-israel-ministry-of-defense-how-things-really-works/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100129/licensed-by-israel-ministry-of-defense-how-things-really-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>O3B Networks: a new satellite broadband approach</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100126/o3b-networks-a-new-satellite-broadband-approach/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100126/o3b-networks-a-new-satellite-broadband-approach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:59:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100126/o3b-networks-a-new-satellite-broadband-approach/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#8217;s something amazing, &#8220;other 3 billion&#8221; broadband coverage not trough fiber but trough satellite. A project where also google is one of the shareholder, covering 3 billion persons trough low orbit, low latency broadband (10GBit) satellite network. Check here technical infrastructure details on ITU website.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100126/o3b-networks-a-new-satellite-broadband-approach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Location Based Services: the big brother thanks you ;-)</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20091201/location-based-services-the-big-brother-thanks-you/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20091201/location-based-services-the-big-brother-thanks-you/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 18:13:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civilrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20091201/location-based-services-the-big-brother-thanks-you/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Do you use your iphone, google phone, blackberry or nokia smartphone with cool built-in GPS? Well law enforcement can now know even better where you are, at any time, even with historical data and much better than BTS based location systems. Sprint has given 8 million times customer&#8217;s GPS information to law enforcement (sound something <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20091201/location-based-services-the-big-brother-thanks-you/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20091201/location-based-services-the-big-brother-thanks-you/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gold-Lock Security Encryption Contest: be careful!</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20091125/gold-lock-security-encryption-contest-be-careful/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20091125/gold-lock-security-encryption-contest-be-careful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:56:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cyberwarfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20091125/gold-lock-security-encryption-contest-be-careful/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This post is to talk about the “unfair” marketing approach of Gold-Lock, an israeli company doing mobile voice encryption authorized by Israeli Ministry of Defence . Following an announcement seen on Linkedin “Information Security Community” group: GoldLock is offering US$ 100.000 and a job for an unencryption GoldLock, an israeli encryption and security company is <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20091125/gold-lock-security-encryption-contest-be-careful/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20091125/gold-lock-security-encryption-contest-be-careful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Disk encryption sometimes &#8216;works&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20091109/disk-encryption-sometimes-works/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20091109/disk-encryption-sometimes-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 13:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cybercrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20091109/disk-encryption-sometimes-works/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am one of the person convinced that a computer disk encryption system will not protect you from public authorities if they are convinced enough and the case is very important. There are a lot of way to convince a person to release a password. However there&#8217;s a case in Australia where not revealing the <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20091109/disk-encryption-sometimes-works/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20091109/disk-encryption-sometimes-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Political conflict in Turkey between Prosecutors and Wiretappers</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20091107/political-conflict-in-turkey-between-prosecutors-and-wiretappers/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20091107/political-conflict-in-turkey-between-prosecutors-and-wiretappers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civilrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20091107/political-conflict-in-turkey-between-prosecutors-and-wiretappers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that in Turkey the Telecommunication Directorate (TIB), in charge of managing the wiretapping, intercepted the president of the Judge and Prosecutors Associations. Prosecutors and Judge usually does not like being tapped, and so the 1st High Criminal Court ordered an audit of all the recording done by the TIB since 2006. Read more <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20091107/political-conflict-in-turkey-between-prosecutors-and-wiretappers/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20091107/political-conflict-in-turkey-between-prosecutors-and-wiretappers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hackers Hacking Hackers</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20090803/hacking-hackers/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20090803/hacking-hackers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hackers hacking hackers are always pretty fun. And I am not talking about ZF05 (which was cool reading, even if not as cool as ~El8 was), I am talking about this.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20090803/hacking-hackers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This is big business, this is the American way</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20090731/this-is-big-business-this-is-the-american-way/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20090731/this-is-big-business-this-is-the-american-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cybercrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/?p=72</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[43 years old &#8220;UFO eccentric&#8221; hacker Gary McKinnon just loses appeal against his extradition to the States for computer crimes he committed 7 years ago. If you&#8217;ve lived under a rock during the last few years what this dude did was basically break into .gov computers looking for UFO related material. Probably the last case <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20090731/this-is-big-business-this-is-the-american-way/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20090731/this-is-big-business-this-is-the-american-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

