<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Playhouse of privacy, security, hacking, encryption, intelligence and some business stuff &#187; security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://infosecurity.ch/category/business/security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://infosecurity.ch</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 22:04:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>RFC 6189: ZRTP is finally a standard!</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20110411/rfc-6189-zrtp-is-finally-a-standard/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20110411/rfc-6189-zrtp-is-finally-a-standard/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2011 21:54:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zrtp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20110411/rfc-6189-zrtp-is-finally-a-standard/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally ZRTP has been assigned an official RFC assignment, RFC6189 ZRTP: Media Path Key Agreement for Unicast Secure RTP. It had as a dependency the SRTP with AES key size of 256bit that now has been defined as RFC6188. It&#8217;s exciting to see the RFC finally released, as it&#8217;s an important milestone to set ZRTP <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20110411/rfc-6189-zrtp-is-finally-a-standard/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20110411/rfc-6189-zrtp-is-finally-a-standard/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Progress for GSM cracking in Freiburg university</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20110223/progress-for-gsm-cracking-in-freiburg-university/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20110223/progress-for-gsm-cracking-in-freiburg-university/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Feb 2011 12:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20110223/progress-for-gsm-cracking-in-freiburg-university/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The exciting world of mobile protocols (GSM, GSM-R, TETRA, UMTS, etc) hacking is getting official research activities from universities. The investment to make opensource code releases of cracking software is giving the opportunity to students of university to work on it, improve it and do strong research. The University of Freiburg just released the paper <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20110223/progress-for-gsm-cracking-in-freiburg-university/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20110223/progress-for-gsm-cracking-in-freiburg-university/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TETRA hacking is coming: OsmocomTETRA</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20110123/tetra-hacking-is-coming-osmocomtetra/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20110123/tetra-hacking-is-coming-osmocomtetra/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Jan 2011 09:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20110123/tetra-hacking-is-coming-osmocomtetra/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s very exciting to see the release of OsmocomTETRA, the first opensource SDR (Software Defined Radio) implementation of TETRA demodulator, PHY and lower MAC layers. It&#8217;s the TETRA version of GSM airprobe that unlock access to the data and frame of TETRA communication protocol, thus giving great hacking opportunity! Now that also TETRA technology has <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20110123/tetra-hacking-is-coming-osmocomtetra/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20110123/tetra-hacking-is-coming-osmocomtetra/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Encrypted mobile to landline phone calls with Asterisk 1.8</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20101025/encrypted-mobile-to-landline-phone-calls-with-asterisk-1-8/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20101025/encrypted-mobile-to-landline-phone-calls-with-asterisk-1-8/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:15:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20101025/encrypted-mobile-to-landline-phone-calls-with-asterisk-1-8/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We just released a technical howto on how to build up Secured mobile to landline VoIP infrastructure with: Asterisk 1.8 (just released, support SIP/TLS + SDES key exchange for SRTP) PrivateGSM Enterprise (Nokia / iPhone / Blackberry) SNOM 300 Desktop phone In next weeks others howto like this one will come out by using other <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20101025/encrypted-mobile-to-landline-phone-calls-with-asterisk-1-8/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20101025/encrypted-mobile-to-landline-phone-calls-with-asterisk-1-8/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Eight Epic Failure of Regulating Cryptography</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20101021/eight-epic-failure-of-regulating-cryptography/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20101021/eight-epic-failure-of-regulating-cryptography/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 13:59:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20101021/eight-epic-failure-of-regulating-cryptography/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A very illuminating article on Eight Epic Failure of Regulating Cryptography and common misunderstanding by government regulators that doesn&#8217;t have a wide view on how technology works. Ignorant government regulators does not understood that strict regulation would have the following drawbacks: It will create security risk It won&#8217;t stop the bad guys It will harm <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20101021/eight-epic-failure-of-regulating-cryptography/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20101021/eight-epic-failure-of-regulating-cryptography/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>PrivateGSM: Blackberry/iPhone/Nokia mobile voice encryption with ZRTP or SRTP/SDES</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20101019/privategsm-blackberryiphonenokia-mobile-voice-encryption-with-zrtp-or-srtpsdes/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20101019/privategsm-blackberryiphonenokia-mobile-voice-encryption-with-zrtp-or-srtpsdes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 08:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zrtp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20101019/privategsm-blackberryiphonenokia-mobile-voice-encryption-with-zrtp-or-srtpsdes/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I absolutely avoid to use my own personal blog to make promotion of any kind of product. That time it&#8217;s not different, but i want to tell you facts about products i work on without fancy marketing, but staying technical. Today, at PrivateWave where i am CTO and co-founder, we released publicly mobile VoIP encryption <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20101019/privategsm-blackberryiphonenokia-mobile-voice-encryption-with-zrtp-or-srtpsdes/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20101019/privategsm-blackberryiphonenokia-mobile-voice-encryption-with-zrtp-or-srtpsdes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A couple of nice VPN provider</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20101017/a-couple-of-nice-vpn-provider/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20101017/a-couple-of-nice-vpn-provider/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20101017/a-couple-of-nice-vpn-provider/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are a lot of reason why one would need to access internet trough a VPN. For example if you live in a country blocking certain contents (like anti-local-government website, porn, etc) and/or protocols (like skype, voip) you would probably want to move your internet connectivity outside the nasty blocking country by using encrypted VPN <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20101017/a-couple-of-nice-vpn-provider/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20101017/a-couple-of-nice-vpn-provider/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not every elliptic curve is the same: trough on ECC security</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100926/not-every-elliptic-curve-is-the-same-trough-on-ecc-security/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100926/not-every-elliptic-curve-is-the-same-trough-on-ecc-security/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Sep 2010 12:05:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zrtp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100926/not-every-elliptic-curve-is-the-same-trough-on-ecc-security/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My own ECC curve security and selection analysis Most modern crypto use Elliptic Curve Cryptographic (ECC) that, with a smaller key size and reduce computation power, give equivalent security strength of traditional crypto system known as DH (Diffie-Hellman) or RSA (Rivest, Shamir and Adleman) . Not everyone knows that ECC encryption is selected for any <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100926/not-every-elliptic-curve-is-the-same-trough-on-ecc-security/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100926/not-every-elliptic-curve-is-the-same-trough-on-ecc-security/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>ESSOR, European Secure Software Defined Radio (SDR)</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100925/essor-european-secure-software-defined-radio-sdr/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100925/essor-european-secure-software-defined-radio-sdr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100925/essor-european-secure-software-defined-radio-sdr/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I had a look at European Defense Agency website and found the ESSOR project, a working project funded for 106mln EUR to develop strategic defense communication products based on new Software Defined Radio approach. SDR approach is a revolutionary system that&#8217;s completely changing the way scientist and industry is approach any kind of wireless technology. <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100925/essor-european-secure-software-defined-radio-sdr/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100925/essor-european-secure-software-defined-radio-sdr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Remotely intercepting snom VoIP phones</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100910/remotely-intercepting-snom-voip-phones/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100910/remotely-intercepting-snom-voip-phones/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100910/remotely-intercepting-snom-voip-phones/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I suggest reading remotely tapping VoIp phones&#8221; on VoIP Security Alliance Blog by Shawn Merdinger . A concrete example on how current telephony infrastructure are getting more vulnerable to cyber attacks.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100910/remotely-intercepting-snom-voip-phones/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Voice communication security workshop</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100826/voice-communication-security-workshop/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100826/voice-communication-security-workshop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:04:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100826/voice-communication-security-workshop/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, i made a talk about voice communication security technologies at University of Trento following an interesting information exchange with Crypto Lab managed Professor Massimiliano Sala . I suggest interested people to read it, especially the second part, as there is an innovative categorization of the various voice encryption technologies that get used in several <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100826/voice-communication-security-workshop/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100826/voice-communication-security-workshop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>27C3 &#8211; CCC Congress CFP: We come in peace</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100815/27c3-ccc-congress-cfp-we-come-in-peace/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100815/27c3-ccc-congress-cfp-we-come-in-peace/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Aug 2010 07:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kudos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100815/27c3-ccc-congress-cfp-we-come-in-peace/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We come in peace We come in peace, said the conquerers of the New World. We come in peace, says the government, when it comes to colonise, regulate, and militarise the new digital world. We come in peace, say the nation-state sized companies that have set out to monetise the net and chain the users <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100815/27c3-ccc-congress-cfp-we-come-in-peace/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100815/27c3-ccc-congress-cfp-we-come-in-peace/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GSM cracking in penetration test methodologies (OSSTMM) ?</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100723/gsm-cracking-in-penetration-test-methodologies-osstmm/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100723/gsm-cracking-in-penetration-test-methodologies-osstmm/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 07:16:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100723/gsm-cracking-in-penetration-test-methodologies-osstmm/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As most of this blog reader already know, in past years there was a lot of activities related to public research for GSM auditing and cracking. However when there was huge media coverage to GSM cracking research results, the tools to make the cracking was really early stage and still very inefficient. Now Frank Stevenson <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100723/gsm-cracking-in-penetration-test-methodologies-osstmm/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100723/gsm-cracking-in-penetration-test-methodologies-osstmm/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Snake-oil security claims on crypto security product</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100719/snake-oil-security-claims-on-crypto-security-product/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100719/snake-oil-security-claims-on-crypto-security-product/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:33:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100719/snake-oil-security-claims-on-crypto-security-product/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Security market grow, more companies goes to the market, but how many of them are taking seriously what they do? You know, doing security technology mean that you are personally responsible for the protection of the user&#8217;s information. You must make them aware of what they need, exactly what your are doing and which kind <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100719/snake-oil-security-claims-on-crypto-security-product/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100719/snake-oil-security-claims-on-crypto-security-product/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Web2.0 privacy leak in Mobile apps</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100717/web2-0-privacy-leak-in-mobile-apps/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100717/web2-0-privacy-leak-in-mobile-apps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Jul 2010 08:02:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100717/web2-0-privacy-leak-in-mobile-apps/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You know that web2.0 world it&#8217;s plenty of leak of any kind (profiling, profiling, profiling) related to Privacy and users starts being concerned about it. Users continuously download applications without knowing the details of what they do, for example iFart just because are cool, are fun and sometime are useful. On mobile phones users install <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100717/web2-0-privacy-leak-in-mobile-apps/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100717/web2-0-privacy-leak-in-mobile-apps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AES algorithm selected for use in space</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100708/aes-algorithm-selected-for-use-in-space/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100708/aes-algorithm-selected-for-use-in-space/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 11:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100708/aes-algorithm-selected-for-use-in-space/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I encountered a nice paper regarding analysis and consideration on which encryption algorithm it&#8217;s best suited for use in the space by space ship and equipments. The paper has been done by the Consultative Committee for Space Data Systems that&#8217;s a consortium of all space agency around that cumulatively handled more than 400 mission to <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100708/aes-algorithm-selected-for-use-in-space/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100708/aes-algorithm-selected-for-use-in-space/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blackberry Security and Encryption: Devil or Angel?</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100707/blackberry-security-and-encryption-devil-or-angel/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100707/blackberry-security-and-encryption-devil-or-angel/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 21:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100707/blackberry-security-and-encryption-devil-or-angel/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blackberry have good and bad reputation regarding his security capability, depending from which angle you look at it. This post it&#8217;s a summarized set of information to let the reader the get picture, without taking much a position as RIM and Blackberry can be considered, depending on the point of view, an extremely secure platform <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100707/blackberry-security-and-encryption-devil-or-angel/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100707/blackberry-security-and-encryption-devil-or-angel/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Celebrating &#8220;Hackers&#8221; after 25 years</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100701/celebrating-hackers-after-25-years/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100701/celebrating-hackers-after-25-years/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 07:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kudos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100701/celebrating-hackers-after-25-years/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A cult book, ever green since 25 years. It&#8217;s been 25 years since &#8220;Hackers&#8221; was published. Author Steven Levy reflects on the book and the movement. http://radar.oreilly.com/2010/06/hackers-at-25.htmlSteven Levy wrote a book in the mid-1980s that introduced the term "hacker" -- the positive connotation -- to a wide audience. In the ensuing 25 years, that word <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100701/celebrating-hackers-after-25-years/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100701/celebrating-hackers-after-25-years/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Botnet for RSA cracking?</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100630/botnet-for-rsa-cracking/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100630/botnet-for-rsa-cracking/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2010 13:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100630/botnet-for-rsa-cracking/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I read an interesting article about putting 1.000.000 computers, given the chance for a serious botnet owner to get it, to crack RSA. The result is that in such context attacking an RSA 1024bit key would take only 28 years, compared to theoretical 19 billion of years. Reading of this article, is extremely interesting because <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100630/botnet-for-rsa-cracking/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100630/botnet-for-rsa-cracking/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>China Encryption Regulations</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100616/china-encryption-regulations/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100616/china-encryption-regulations/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jun 2010 12:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cyberwarfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100616/china-encryption-regulations/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi all, i found this very interesting paper on China Encryption Import/Export/Domestic Regulations done by Baker&#38;Mckenzie in the US. It&#8217;s strongly business and regulatory oriented giving a very well done view on how china regulations works and how it may behave in future. Read here Decrypting China Encryption&#8217;s Regulations (form Bakernet website) .]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100616/china-encryption-regulations/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>IOScat &#8211; a Port of Netcat to Cisco IOS</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100613/ioscat-a-port-of-netcat-to-cisco-ios/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100613/ioscat-a-port-of-netcat-to-cisco-ios/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100613/ioscat-a-port-of-netcat-to-cisco-ios/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A porting of famous netcat to Cisco IOS router operating system: IOSCat The only main limit is that it does not support UDP, but that&#8217;s a very cool tool! A very good txt to read is Netcat hacker Manual.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100613/ioscat-a-port-of-netcat-to-cisco-ios/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The (old) Crypto AG case and some thinking about it</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100607/the-old-crypto-ag-case-and-some-thinking-about-it/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100607/the-old-crypto-ag-case-and-some-thinking-about-it/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 17:40:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cyberwarfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100607/the-old-crypto-ag-case-and-some-thinking-about-it/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the &#8217;90, closed source and proprietary cryptography was ruling the world. That&#8217;s before open source and scientifically approved encrypted technologies went out as a best practice to do crypto stuff. I would like to remind when, in 1992, USA along with Israel was, together with switzerland, providing backdoored (proprietary and secret) technologies to Iranian <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100607/the-old-crypto-ag-case-and-some-thinking-about-it/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100607/the-old-crypto-ag-case-and-some-thinking-about-it/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Missiles against cyber attacks?</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100607/missiles-against-cyber-attacks/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100607/missiles-against-cyber-attacks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jun 2010 16:40:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cyberwarfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100607/missiles-against-cyber-attacks/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The cyber conflicts are really reaching a point where war and cyberwar merge together. NATO countries have the right to use the force against attacks on computer networks.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100607/missiles-against-cyber-attacks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mobile Security talk at WHYMCA conference</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100602/mobile-security-talk-at-whymca-conference/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100602/mobile-security-talk-at-whymca-conference/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jun 2010 18:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zrtp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100602/mobile-security-talk-at-whymca-conference/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I want to share some slides i used to talk about mobile security at whymca mobile conference in Milan. Read here my slides on mobile security . The slides provide a wide an in-depth overview of mobile security related matters, i should be doing some slidecast about it putting also audio. Maybe will do, maybe <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100602/mobile-security-talk-at-whymca-conference/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100602/mobile-security-talk-at-whymca-conference/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>iPhone PIN: useless encryption</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100601/iphone-pin-useless-encryption/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100601/iphone-pin-useless-encryption/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 13:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100601/iphone-pin-useless-encryption/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently switched one of my multiple mobile phones with which i go around to iPhone. I am particularly concerned about data protection in case of theft and so started having a look around about the iPhone provided protection system. There is an interesting set of iPhone Business Security Features that make me think that <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100601/iphone-pin-useless-encryption/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100601/iphone-pin-useless-encryption/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who extract Oil in Iran? Business and UN sanction together</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100601/who-extract-oil-in-iran-business-and-un-sanction-together/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100601/who-extract-oil-in-iran-business-and-un-sanction-together/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 08:21:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[civilrights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[policy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100601/who-extract-oil-in-iran-business-and-un-sanction-together/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like geopolitic and i am following carefully iran issues. I went to National Iranian Oil Company website and have seen &#8220;Exploration &#38; Production&#8221; section where are listed all the companies and their country of origin that are allowed to make Exploration of oil in Iran. On that list we find the list of countries <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100601/who-extract-oil-in-iran-business-and-un-sanction-together/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100601/who-extract-oil-in-iran-business-and-un-sanction-together/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Exploit code against SecurStar DriveCrypt published</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100525/hackers-doesnt-like-securstar-products-exploit-code-against-drivecrypt-published/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100525/hackers-doesnt-like-securstar-products-exploit-code-against-drivecrypt-published/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 16:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Kudos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100525/hackers-doesnt-like-securstar-products-exploit-code-against-drivecrypt-published/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that the hacking community somehow like to target securstar products, maybe because hacking community doesn&#8217;t like the often revealed unethical approach already previously described in this blog by articles and user&#8217;s comments. In 2004 a lot of accusation against Hafner of SecurStar went out because of alleged intellectual property theft regarding opensource codes <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100525/hackers-doesnt-like-securstar-products-exploit-code-against-drivecrypt-published/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100525/hackers-doesnt-like-securstar-products-exploit-code-against-drivecrypt-published/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Quantum cryptography broken</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100520/quantum-cryptography-broken/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100520/quantum-cryptography-broken/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 19:15:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zrtp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100520/quantum-cryptography-broken/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Quantum cryptography it&#8217;s something very challenging, encryption methods that leverage the law of phisycs to secure communications over fiber lines. To oversimplify the system is based on the fact that if someone cut the fiber, put a tap in the middle, and joint together the other side of the fiber, the amount of &#8220;errors&#8221; that <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100520/quantum-cryptography-broken/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100520/quantum-cryptography-broken/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>FUN! Infosecurity consideration on some well known films</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100518/fun-infosecurity-consideration-on-some-well-known-films/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100518/fun-infosecurity-consideration-on-some-well-known-films/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 19:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100518/fun-infosecurity-consideration-on-some-well-known-films/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Please read it carefully Film that needed better infosec. One the the review, imho the most fun one on film Star Wars: The scene Death star getting blown up Infosec Analysis Darth Vader must be heralded as the prime example of a chief executive who really didn&#8217;t care about information security. The entire board was <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100518/fun-infosecurity-consideration-on-some-well-known-films/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100518/fun-infosecurity-consideration-on-some-well-known-films/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>great point of view</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/great-point-of-view/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/great-point-of-view/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 17:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/great-point-of-view/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Because security of a cryptographic system it&#8217;s not a matter of &#8220;how many bits do i use&#8221; but using the right approach to do the right thing to mitigate the defined security risk in the most balanced way.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/great-point-of-view/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Encryption is not scrambling: be aware of scrambler!</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/encryption-is-not-scrambling-be-aware-of-scrambler/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/encryption-is-not-scrambling-be-aware-of-scrambler/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 16:50:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zrtp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/encryption-is-not-scrambling-be-aware-of-scrambler/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of us know about voice scrambler that can be used across almost any kind of voice based communication technology. Extremely flexible approach: works everything Extreme performance: very low latency but unfortunately&#8230; Extremely weak: Scrambling cannot be considered secure. Only encryption can be considered secure under the Kerckoff&#8217;s principle . So please don&#8217;t even consider <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/encryption-is-not-scrambling-be-aware-of-scrambler/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100420/encryption-is-not-scrambling-be-aware-of-scrambler/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Evidence that infosecurityguard.com/notrax is SecurStar GmbH Phonecrypt &#8211; A fake independent research on voice crypto</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/evidence-that-infosecurityguard-comnotrax-is-securstar-gmbh-a-fake-independent-research-on-voice-crypto/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/evidence-that-infosecurityguard-comnotrax-is-securstar-gmbh-a-fake-independent-research-on-voice-crypto/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/evidence-that-infosecurityguard-comnotrax-is-securstar-gmbh-a-fake-independent-research-on-voice-crypto/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Below evidence that the security review made by an anonymous hacker on http://infosecurityguard.com is in facts a dishonest marketing plan by the SecurStar GmbH to promote their voice crypto product. I already wrote about that voice crypto analysis that appeared to me very suspicious. Now it&#8217;s confirmed, it&#8217;s a fake independent hacker security research by <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/evidence-that-infosecurityguard-comnotrax-is-securstar-gmbh-a-fake-independent-research-on-voice-crypto/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/evidence-that-infosecurityguard-comnotrax-is-securstar-gmbh-a-fake-independent-research-on-voice-crypto/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dishonest security: The SecurStart GmbH Phonecrypt case</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/dishonest-security-the-securstart-gmbh-case/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/dishonest-security-the-securstart-gmbh-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:30:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/dishonest-security-the-securstart-gmbh-case/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to provide considerations on the concept of ethics that a security company should have respect to the users, the media and the security environment. SecurStar GmbH made very bad things making that infosecuriguard.com fake independent research. It&#8217;s unfair approach respect to hacking community. It&#8217;s unfair marketing to end user. They should not <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/dishonest-security-the-securstart-gmbh-case/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100201/dishonest-security-the-securstart-gmbh-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>About the SecurStar GmbH Phonecrypt voice encryption analysis (criteria, errors and different results)</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100130/about-the-voice-encryption-analysis-phonecrypt-can-be-intercepted-serious-security-evaluation-criteria/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100130/about-the-voice-encryption-analysis-phonecrypt-can-be-intercepted-serious-security-evaluation-criteria/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[encryption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[marketing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zrtp]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100130/about-the-voice-encryption-analysis-phonecrypt-can-be-intercepted-serious-security-evaluation-criteria/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This article want to clarify and better explain the finding at infosecurityguard.com regaring voice encryption product evaluation. This article want to tell you a different point of view other than infosecurityguard.com and explaining which are the rational with extensive explaination from security point of view. Today i read news saying: &#8220;PhoneCrypt: Basic Vulnerability Found in <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100130/about-the-voice-encryption-analysis-phonecrypt-can-be-intercepted-serious-security-evaluation-criteria/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100130/about-the-voice-encryption-analysis-phonecrypt-can-be-intercepted-serious-security-evaluation-criteria/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Licensed by Israel Ministry of Defense? How things really works!</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20100129/licensed-by-israel-ministry-of-defense-how-things-really-works/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20100129/licensed-by-israel-ministry-of-defense-how-things-really-works/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 09:12:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cyberwarfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[voicesecurity]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20100129/licensed-by-israel-ministry-of-defense-how-things-really-works/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You should know that Israel is a country where if a company need to develop encryption product they must be authorized by the government. The government don&#8217;t want that companies doing cryptography can do anything bad to them and what they can do of good for the government, so they have to first be authorized. <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20100129/licensed-by-israel-ministry-of-defense-how-things-really-works/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20100129/licensed-by-israel-ministry-of-defense-how-things-really-works/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recuva: Nice windows data recovery tool</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20091112/recuva-nice-windows-data-recovery-tool/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20091112/recuva-nice-windows-data-recovery-tool/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 12:10:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hacking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20091112/recuva-nice-windows-data-recovery-tool/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not a professional tool but an easy, quick and free one. If you just accidently deleted some files on windows or your employee leave the company deleting all his data, well that you get out from trouble quickly. It also came out in a &#8216;portable&#8217; version to be loaded from an usb stick drive. Check <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20091112/recuva-nice-windows-data-recovery-tool/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20091112/recuva-nice-windows-data-recovery-tool/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Military contractors going commercial</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20091110/military-contractors-going-commercial/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20091110/military-contractors-going-commercial/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 10:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20091110/military-contractors-going-commercial/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most military contractors are suffering from the restriction of government&#8217;s budgets for military expenses and are moving into commercial markets, still they have to adjust a lot of things. Read here a nice analysis from rochtel on how military contractors should adapt their strategy.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20091110/military-contractors-going-commercial/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Brazilian Electrical Blackout: preview of cyberwar</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20091107/brazilian-electrical-blackout-preview-of-cyberwar/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20091107/brazilian-electrical-blackout-preview-of-cyberwar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 14:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>naif</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[cyberwarfare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intelligence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/20091107/brazilian-electrical-blackout-preview-of-cyberwar/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In 2005 and 2007 in Brazil million of people was targetted by a blackout. Initially it appeared like an accident. Now it&#8217;s known that was caused by a cyber attack against electricity control systems. That was just a preview of what a cyber attack in a cyberwar means. In near future we&#8217;ll probably see something <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20091107/brazilian-electrical-blackout-preview-of-cyberwar/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20091107/brazilian-electrical-blackout-preview-of-cyberwar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Conventionality is not morality.</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20090806/conventionality-is-not-morality/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20090806/conventionality-is-not-morality/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Aug 2009 19:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cybercrime]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[During my daily RSS OCD reading I had to deal with this article: it has been written by a &#8220;senior anti-virus researcher at Kaspersky Lab&#8217;s&#8220;. Talk about personal interest. I wont comment on the practical implications of useless signature based AV&#8217;s and how cyber criminals will never need amateur-ish projects to carry on their malicious tactics. <a href="http://infosecurity.ch/20090806/conventionality-is-not-morality/"> read more <span class="meta-nav">&#187;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20090806/conventionality-is-not-morality/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hackers Hacking Hackers</title>
		<link>http://infosecurity.ch/20090803/hacking-hackers/</link>
		<comments>http://infosecurity.ch/20090803/hacking-hackers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 12:22:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>g</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[interception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[security]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://infosecurity.ch/?p=81</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hackers hacking hackers are always pretty fun. And I am not talking about ZF05 (which was cool reading, even if not as cool as ~El8 was), I am talking about this.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://infosecurity.ch/20090803/hacking-hackers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

